Tuesday, July 10, 2018

WHO guidelines dictating adverse reactions not to be blamed on vaccines

The highest incidents of vaccine damage seem to come from cases where multiple vaccines are combined in a single shot or single sitting. 

Would a simple advocacy of spreading out the vaccine intakes instead of taking them at one shot also be labelled as being "anti-vaxxer"? 
Are the parents asking for the right to spread out shots for their babies really a threat to all children as our highly scientific friends have been asserting? 
Would we label doctors who advise this as "baby killers"? 
Would we penalize or imprison or deny welfare to parents who try this approach?


Well, we already have.

Would NGOs working for mothers and children that call for caution regarding combined vaccines, get any funding the next year?
Are they instead rewarded for ensuring more and more single-sitting-many-vaccinations happen as a great way to ensure 100% coverage?

Vaccination issue is the smoking gun that reveals something is deeply wrong with the sector that calls itself "Civil Society". 
And where there's been one serious misunderstanding, there can be more.




New Guidelines from WHO Put Children's Life At Risk: Paediatricians

Press Release

Two leading paediatricians in India have urged the World Health Organization (WHO) to urgently revise its manual on classification of Adverse Events Following Immunization (AEFI), warning that the new guidelines put children's life at risk.

This needs to be done "urgently in the interest of child safety," Doctors Jacob Puliyel at St Stephen's Hospital in Delhi, and Pathik Naik of Children Hospital in Surat, say in a report published in the prestigious journal 'F1000Research'

Under WHO's revised manual on AEFI, only those adverse reactions observed during clinical trials of a vaccine, should be classified as vaccine related. All new serious adverse reactions, including deaths seen during post-marketing of the vaccine should be considered as 'coincidental' or 'unclassifiable', and the vaccine should not be blamed.

The WHO has also changed the definition of "causal association," the doctors say. Under the revised guidelines, if there is an alternate explanation for the adverse event, or another factor is involved, causative association with vaccine should not be made.

"In other words, if after vaccination, a child with an underlying congenital heart disease develops cardiac failure, it would not be considered causally related to the vaccine."

The revised classification by WHO "is a major step backward for patient safety," the authors say, adding, "This could embolden vaccine manufacturers to be more reckless with regard to adverse reactions."

Puliyel and Naik note that the Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety has documented many deaths in children with pre-existing heart disease after they were administered the pentavalent vaccine (combined diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, Hib, and hepatitis-B vaccine).

Under WHO's new definition of causal association, these deaths would not be acknowledged as related to vaccination.

Both Sri Lanka and Vietnam governments withdrew the pentavalent vaccine, following the deaths of five children in Sri Lanka and 12 in Vietnam, soon after vaccination. But WHO investigating teams declared that the deaths were 'unlikely' to be related to vaccination, the report says.

The authors point out that a new study in India, showed that the switch from DPT(diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis) to pentavalent vaccine almost doubled the deaths following vaccination.

A large number of these deaths could have been avoided had the AEFI manual not been revised.

According to their report, the consequence of India adopting WHO's new classification can be seen from the causality assessment of 132 serious AEFI cases uploaded on the website of the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Of the total AEFI cases, 54 babies died and 78 survived,

but not even one death was classified as vaccine-related. Nearly all the deaths were simply classified as unclassifiable or coincidental.

Vaccines are drugs used as a preventive measure, given to healthy persons.  Adverse events following immunization must be monitored more carefully than other drugs, the authors note.

A credible immunization safety evaluation and monitoring system is essential for the success of immunization programmes.

Adverse reaction and deaths may not show up as significantly increased in small safety studies. However, records of all deaths and serious adverse events following vaccinations should be maintained and periodically reviewed for safety signals.

According to the authors, WHO's new AEFI classification scheme "that allows for an outright denial of any new causative association with vaccination" could fall foul of Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Adverse reaction and deaths may not show up as significantly increased in small safety studies. However, records of all deaths and serious adverse events following vaccinations should be maintained and periodically reviewed for safety signals.

Paradoxically, the AEFI algorithm is said to be for vaccine safety," says Puliyel. "Perhaps we need a scheme for public safety rather than vaccine safety.

Press Release

Study


Saturday, July 7, 2018

Flirting with the enemy

Read the newsletter forwarded below.

I'm seeing what these folks are saying since more than 10 years now. Consistent. Not haters, not evil, not shilling for big corporates. Opposed every war. Disagreeing with bad government policies whether its a Republican doing it or a Democrat. 

Till some time back all these folks were called liberals / libertarians, and now they're called far-right extremists. What they're saying hasn't changed; what the mainstream is saying about them has. The people who justified countless wars are now telling us that these people who opposed all those wars are evil.

Oh, and no matter how desperately you try to convince me that there is no such thing as "mainstream", I'm sorry to disappoint you, but there IS a mainstream, there IS a collective that believes it knows better than anyone else and is in pole positions to override other people's opinions and push its own, and it can be recognised by the synchronicity, the moral policing, the sheer repeatedness in what its members do, say and omit. The other side, in comparison, is constantly disagreeing with each other and is never supporting forcing things on people.

This particular guy, Mike Adams, whose clips come in practically every alternative health documentary for his work on alternative cancer treatments and heavy metals detection and runs a certified lab specialising in the latter, at the same time opposes the mainstream climate change narrative AND promotes sustainable living, anti-pollution, renewable energy, anti-pesticides. So that tears apart the conventional climate change narrative for me, because I've been told that anybody who objects to climate change must be a shill for big oil or coal companies. 

I don't have to agree with everything they say to respect them, and I'm not expecting them to be unbiased or objective : I know that's as irresponsible as expecting a perfect wife or husband or job. I'm a lot more comfortable knowing what the source's beliefs and worldviews are, so that I know where they're coming from when they report things.

So for some time, I beg you, please lower your guard and flirt a little with those you've been trained to see as your enemy. If nothing else, you should at least familiarise yourself with what the other side is thinking and talking about, instead of being blindingly ignorant of about 99% of it and imagining they're all just Trump worshippers and there's nothing more to them. Do you know anything at all about Count Dankula? Milo? Lauren Southern? Candance Owens? Jordan Peterson? Prager U? Ben Shapiro? Dave Rubin? PJ Watson? GamerGate? Ayan Ali Hirsi? Yasmine Mohammad? Lee Camp? Some Black Guy? Steven Crowder? Health Ranger? (some of these people hate Trump btw. But since they're anti-Hillary too they've been branded as right-wing just the same!) 

If you've already been instructed by your most trusted "unbiased" sources to hate all these people who collectively don't make more than what a top CNN or BBC anchor would make (isn't that an oxymoron : an unbiased source being able to transfer a hatred into you? Are they truly unbiased then, or were they sneaking in their undeclared opinions under the guise of objectivity??) and most of whom have budgets much tinier than what CNN or BBS do, , have you bothered independently investigating what they themselves have to say?



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: NaturalNews <>
Date: Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 1:35 AM
Subject: Facebook bans the Declaration of Independence as "hate speech"



 
NaturalNews.com
Facebook bans the Declaration of Independence as "hate speech"
Mike Adams

As further proof of the tech giants' war against America and the freedom to speak, Facebook banned a post containing actual text from the U.S. Declaration of Independence.

The tyranny, censorship and anti-American hatred of the left-wing tech corporations is now on full display. They truly despise America, and they openly seek to silence anyone who supports our shared history.

Read my full article (and warning) here.

Keep your arteries ecstatic by eating these 12 foods every day

By Bridgette Wilcox | Read the full story

Ultra-quick electric pulses killing cancer cells – Time for the world to pay close attention

By S.D. Wells | Read the full story

Sponsor: Reap the benefits of two nutritional powerhouses with this Pure Microalgae Superfood Blend
Dump your toxic facewash for this healthy alternative: Honey

By Bridgette Wilcox | Read the full story

15 herbs that naturally detox your kidneys

By Russel Davis | Read the full story

Sponsor: This 1 veggie can reverse your vision loss (and even restore 20/20 in days)
Facebook purging all health freedom accounts in latest tyrannical effort to crush access to natural health, nutrition and alternative medicine information

By Vicki Batts | Read the full story

Sponsor: Organic, lab-verified storable food supply made completely without junk ingredients or GMOs.
Get heavy metals lab test results for your food, water, supplements or hair

Our ICP-MS test kit analyzes your sample for 20 heavy metals and nutritive minerals, including lead, mercury, zinc, aluminum, magnesium and more.

Learn More »

More of Today's Articles

Left-wing agenda now becomes clear: The complete elimination of prisons, borders, and profits after the violent socialist "revolution"
The Democratic Party is transforming in a way that few older voters now recognize. It's no longer the party of Bill Clinton and it's long since stopped being the party of JFK. Today a growing ...

Washington Times awakens to the Mike Adams truth that once seemed bizarre: Obama was a "sleeper cell" in the White House
In a December 2015 column,Natural News founder and editor Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, wrote that President Obama was a "sleeper cell" and he was overseeing the destruction of American ...

Cinnamon spice found to help eliminate unwanted body fat
If you're looking to get rid of stubborn belly fat, try raiding your spice rack. A preliminary study has suggested that cinnamon may be efficient in preventing fat from settling around the ...

Cordyceps offers many health benefits and has been used medicinally for centuries
Cordycepsis truly fascinating, and it is currently at the center of a search for effective pharmacological products that exhibit certain characteristics. One such study looked at the current ...

Prepping to barter when SHTF: What skills to learn and items to stockpile
After the world has gone sour, do you think banks and financial institutions would still function and keep printing money? Do you think we would still be able to walk up to a store and trade a ...

Magnetic nanoparticles seen as effective material for stopping internal bleeding
Many people suffer from injuries that often don't show any visible signs of damage. Certain chronic diseases and traumas can lead to massive internal bleeding, which typically require ...

Study: Moringa leaf powder improves the immune system of HIV patients undergoing antiretroviral therapy
People with HIV could stand to benefit from adding powdered moringaleaves (Moringa oleifera) to their weight, especially during antiretroviral therapy, as this can improve their nutritional status ...

Systematic science review finds that ibuprofen is no better than placebo in treating back pain
It's a familiar scene in TV commercials:A person, who is clearly suffering, pops an over-the-counter pain medication and like magic, they can suddenly return to their favorite activities as if ...

Painful menstruation can be reduced with acupoint-stimulation
Good news for the ladies who need pain relief from menstrual cramps but don't want to take pharmaceutical drugs like NSAIDs. A recent Chinese review reported that the stimulation of ...

Treat your chronic pain naturally with acupuncture
Instead of taking drug treatments for chronic pain, try acupuncture. In a study published in the journal BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, thetherapeutic effects of acupuncture on ...

Doing this 22 minutes a day will help you fight deadly heart disease
Staving off heart disease is simplerthan you think. A recent study has found that the simple act of brisk walking for just 22 minutes a day is a great measure to prevent coronary heart disease ...

This herb, found in many regions in China, can reduce high uric acid levels and prevent gouty arthritis
Wandering cudweed (Gnaphalium pensylvanicum willd.), an annual herbal plant that is widely distributed in many regions of China, can help reduce high uric acid levels and fight gouty arthritis, ...

WebSeed 7850 N. Silverbell Rd. #114-349 Tucson, AZ 85743


 

 


Friday, July 6, 2018

A talk on transgenderism and where the social justice movement took it

Transgenderism is Ideology NOT Science! (Dr. Leonard Sax Uncut)  | Louder With Crowder -StevenCrowder, 2018-07-06

"2000+ years of men using differences between men and women to justify limiting opportunity for women. I get that. And so many of these modern social justice warriors feel that the only virtuous thing is to deny that there's any differences... the only way we're going to ensure equal opportunity for women is to insist that male and female are social constructs, people invent them, they can create them, change them any way they like, and that might fit a certain social justice warrior kind of worldview, but it happens to be false. It's not true."

"it seems as though a social agenda is driving in many ways science and medicine and not the other way around"

"20 years ago when a girl wanted to roll in the mud and wrestle a hog, that was fine. Now, the parents are asked, maybe your daughter is trans. Have you thought about transitioning her to the male role?"

"there's a lot of ways to be a boy or a girl. And the ironic results of social justice warriors is that ... they are ironically creating stereotypes. A girl who doesn't want to play with dolls, she must be trans : No she's not trans! There's more than one way to be a girl."

"it is asinine to me to argue that a child should be able to transition before they've reached the age of consent. So I can only consent sexually at 16. But I'm going to make a decision that permanently affects my sexual wellbeing and my sexual lifestyle by the time I'm 8 because chaz jennings had a show.."


.. and there's so much more on the core topic of transgenderism itself including how it can harm the natural expression of homosexuality, but these parts were important for me as they show the inter-connection from where the gender equality movement begins with noble intentions and how it then manifests into: 

1. Scores of little children having irreversible harmful operations and dangerous chemicals done on them playing havoc with their bodies with the assumption that screwing up somebody's hormones, preventing the natural onset of puberty in a human being's body isn't going to have any effect on the rest of the health., 
2. In law and civil discourse where it's led to mass and arbitrary censorship regimes that are entirely subject to the whims of the people at the helm and follow no proper rules or structures and have no grievance redress mechanisms, 
3. increased polarisation where anyone dissenting with the "noble" narratives is branded with some or the other "hatist" label, is painted by reputed institutions with large followings as a target for mob violence, and all chances for dialogue are shut down, 
4. enforced speech laws that can send people to prison for not simply not saying the approved things, 
5. and setting up of mechanisms, including all-encompassing digital kill-switches and AI programs that will attack whatever they're told to attack, for totalitarianism to come in and get entrenched, under the guise of social justice and declared noble intentions as any totalitarian in history ever has.


--------

So here's what I'm seeing:
2 extremes: 
Extreme A: There are extreme differences and the twain shall never meet
Extreme B: There are absolutely no differences

Ideas emerging from the middle : 
There are some differences and some similarities and some inter-changeabilities. Denying that those differences exist is as harmful to us as insisting that only the differences exist.
I'll put it in another way:

Insisting that there are no differences at all between men and women, harms women.

Gift Economy

Would you like to show your appreciation for this work through a small contribution?
Contribute

(PS: there's no ads or revenue sources of any kind on this blog)

Related Posts with Thumbnails