The highest incidents of vaccine damage seem to come from cases where multiple vaccines are combined in a single shot or single sitting.
Would a simple advocacy of spreading out the vaccine intakes instead of taking them at one shot also be labelled as being "anti-vaxxer"?
Are the parents asking for the right to spread out shots for their babies really a threat to all children as our highly scientific friends have been asserting?
Would we label doctors who advise this as "baby killers"?
Would we penalize or imprison or deny welfare to parents who try this approach?
Well, we already have.
Would NGOs working for mothers and children that call for caution regarding combined vaccines, get any funding the next year?
Are they instead rewarded for ensuring more and more single-sitting-many-
vaccinations happen as a great way to ensure 100% coverage?
Vaccination issue is the smoking gun that reveals something is deeply wrong with the sector that calls itself "Civil Society".
And where there's been one serious misunderstanding, there can be more.
blog/world-health- organization-s-new-lax- vaccine-safety-policy-leads- more-child-deaths