Thursday, October 26, 2017

Study on vaccinated vs unvaccinated children

Here's a video:

Open question:
Where are do all the liberal pro-choice advocates run off to when it comes to vaccines ? You want the mother to have full choice to terminate the baby at any time prior to birth but no choice at all when it comes to putting problematic chemicals into her baby. Would a less extreme dichotomy of ownership over the baby's body pre and post birth be more beneficial to society in the longer run?
When it comes to vaccines, are you pro-choice?

First critique : Why not more kids in the study?
Critical answer : Because you keep outlawing everything and have started throwing parents in jail and force-vaccinating their babies in their absence., and are even prosecuting doctors who dare to help parents get exemptions for their kids. Very noble and inclusive, and oh-so pro-choice. Threw a perfect opportunity for comparative study out the window, and possibly threw a lot of babies out with it too. Stop being so invasive and be open to parents claiming exemptions rather than going around demonizing people. 

Major concern : We can't allow exemptions! Herd immunity!
Clarification : Vaccinated people are by definition immunised against being infected by vaccine-exempted people : that's what vaccines were originally invented for. If that doesn't happen then it proves that the vaccine does not work and needs to be discarded, and other more macro-level herd-immunity measures need to be taken like ensuring clean water, air and nutritious toxin-free food for everyone (which would be cheaper and more decentralized than the collective taxpayer budgets spent on vaccines).

Next critique: But look there are so and so counter studies that say that vaccinated kids are healthier.. even Google is skewing my search results so I find the pro-vaccine results more...
Critical counter-query : Which of them were sponsored by the companies or govt agencies who are selling vaccines and have billions of $ to make, and which were sponsored by parents and concerned citizens seeking an answer who don't have billions of $ to make? And if you truly believe that the funders don't have an effect on the outcome, then why not go with that assumption and NOT dismiss the research revealing inconvenient results and instead try to get into the nitty gritty to explain the disparity in outcomes? Were the controls in the safety study injected with the same chemicals used in the vaccines or with inert saline water? Were chronic conditions like allergies and asthama, mental conditions and others part of the questionnaire or was it only asked whether the patient got measles or not? Are there any common patterns emerging in the chronological sequence of events for babies that are reported to regress into autism post-vaccination, or is each and every one of all the cases completely unique and unrelated with the other? Were the test specimens in the study administered the same mixture of different vaccines from different producers that are given to babies today or were they administered only one in isolation (making it a non-comprehensive and non-real-world study as there are no babies getting only one vaccine and exempted from the rest) ?

Another one : You want everybody to get polio or die of smallpox??
Critical counter-query : Do YOU want to spend the rest of your life countering a doubt raised about effectiveness or toxicity of a flu or chickenpox or measles vaccine or a sexually transmitted diseases's vaccine administered to underaged girls with an unrelated rhetorical question about vaccines for completely different diseases when you know fully well that vaccines for different diseases are different and cannot be treated as identical to the other?

Yet another one : This is not scientific enough for me. I refuse to accept anything until you show me at least 1 billion permanently damaged or killed babies with undeniable proof that it was vaccines and nothing else that did it..
Reply : All right then go ahead and prove your version of the truth. Make that research happen in a transparent and alteration-proof manner. Don't throw away the graph-disrupting data points. And remember that no one else was born to jump though hoops for your satisfaction.

Documentary series that condense 1000s of pages worth of experts and parents testimonies to videos:
Vaccines Revealed :
The Truth About Vaccines :

More links:
Mom who was imprisoned for refusing to vaccinate her son speaks out
... Rebecca Bredow, refusing to vaccinate her 9-year-old son on religious grounds, while her ex-husband, James Horne, has insisted that his son should be vaccinated and has taken the matter to the courts. The result? Bredow recently landed up in jail for five days for refusing to vaccinate her son, and has had her custody rights reduced; she now has to share custody 50/50 with Mr. Horne. Even worse, the little boy was forcibly vaccinated while Bredow was in jail
... California has just become the first state in America where mandatory vaccinations for adults have become law.
... Following an earlier bill that banned children from refusing to take a vaccination based on religious grounds, these new rules have now made it illegal for adults to refuse vaccines too.
>> There goes the chances of doing any comparative study.
Studies Outside the U.S. Show Unvaccinated Children Healthier than Vaccinated Children
... If you watch the video below of Congressman Posey questioning the CDC at an autism Congressional hearing back in November of 2012, you will hear the CDC admit that they have never conducted a study in the U.S. comparing vaccinated with unvaccinated children.
Vaccinated vs Unvaccinated: The Study Skeptics Tried to Hide
... Snopes Was Part of the Coverup
... The researchers cautiously asked a logical, but unorthodox question: is it possible that all this immune–mediated disease has anything to do with the immune-mediating drugs that children are given in doses five times that of their parents? ... Could it have anything to do with the 50 doses of 15 immune-stimulating vaccines before age six compared to the three doses of three vaccines the last generation — that wasn't so sick — got?
... "I pride myself to have caused the Frontiers anti-vaxx retraction with one tweet!" he tweeted. "The anti-vaxx paper was published as abstract, a reader alerted me, I tweeted, Frontiers got scared, pulled the paper." Before it was published.
>> we're really going to become an enlightened civilization by letting rabid tweets and mob fury censor out peer-review approvals, aren't we?
... Snopes has yet to update their posts about the paper being "retracted," which it never was. It was just delayed.
Censored Study of Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated sees Daylight
... After 30 years of the government immunizing the vaccine makers from harm, the long-delayed, first-of-its-kind study on "vaccinated versus unvaccinated" children has arrived. From five years of designing and conducting the epidemiology survey to more than one censorship roadblock from scientific journals to thwart the study's findings — a damning indictment against vaccines being a false flag cure-all — it appeared in the public domain.
... For six hours on Valentine's Day, the 34-page study breached daylight for six hours before the url link vanished.
... Why hasn't the CDC ever sponsored such a study? Did the health agency neglect doing so by design? After reading Mawson's conclusions, that appears to be the case since it would have run counter to CDC's messaging that all "vaccines are safe."
...“Nowhere else in academia do we see the degree of censorship of inquiry than in this arena. In fact, the economic, professional and political risks of anyone driving safety science in this sphere of U.S public health is so great that it has served to muzzle virtually an entire professional class. Concerned physicians who are surgeons, radiologists, pathologists, primary care physicians, and even pediatricians face whispered threats of loss of licensure for even speaking out from within the profession.”
Anti-vaccination GP's licence suspending following raid in Melbourne
... Dr John Piesse's practice in Mitcham was raided by the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) and police officers last week following allegations he had helped families avoid compulsory childhood vaccinations.

>> here's why this doctor is being prosecuted by the Australian government:
... I have been encountering cases of vaccine injury for over 40 years. In June it was a happy, healthy nearly 5-year-old whose parents were required to put her on a catch-up schedule, in order to get her into kindergarten. She won’t be going to kinder. She’s in a wheel-chair, brain-damaged. Her life ruined. Then came a friend’s father who died after a flu vaccine, and last week a 4 year old boy, made autistic by a catch-up schedule.
... From mid-2015, parents who wished not to vaccinate their children, started to converge on my practice seeking assistance with gaining exemption from the penalties directed at non-vaccinators by the No Jab No Pay and No Jab No Play Legislation.
... Analysis up to the end of 2016 of parent’s reasons for not vaccinating, indicated that 64% of 166 parents knew of vaccine-damaged individuals in their own family. The study of ‘Adversomics’ confirms polymorphic and genomic susceptibility factors common to vaccine–damaged individuals and their families. (Poland GA 2015). 40% of unvaccinated children had pre-existing health problems that parents considered would make them more at risk of harm from vaccines. 60% of unvaccinated children were very healthy, but only 6% of the vaccinated children. There were no cases of autism in 212 unvaccinated children, but 8 autism cases in the 50 vaccinated children (16%), and 36% with ASD, compared to 1.4% in the unvaccinated.

Crowdfunding for Dr.Piesse's court battle with govt and big pharma, and by extension, for the rights of Australian parents to have vaccine exemptions for their babies:

No comments:

Gift Economy

Would you like to show your appreciation for this work through a small contribution?

(PS: there's no ads or revenue sources of any kind on this blog)

Related Posts with Thumbnails