This flowed out while writing another post.. I think it's a good, quick explanation of where I stand, and what the underlying assumptions are in what I say and do.
This author's perspective focuses on transitioning society to a more sustainable state from a relative, doable standpoint rather than an absolutist, impossible one.
The author refutes the self-righteous delusion of criminalizing individual persons for the corruption present in society; rather he sees them as co-sufferers on the same boat, and there is a systemic phenomena that needs to be addressed at systemic, collective level.
The author also refutes the zero-sum-game hypothesis and insists that the much-misquoted 2nd Law of Thermodynamics does not apply to systems that have living beings in them; that it IS possible to increase order over time as exemplified by planet Earth's biosphere; to have win-win situations and increase prosperity for all.
This author's perspective focuses on transitioning society to a more sustainable state from a relative, doable standpoint rather than an absolutist, impossible one.
The author refutes the self-righteous delusion of criminalizing individual persons for the corruption present in society; rather he sees them as co-sufferers on the same boat, and there is a systemic phenomena that needs to be addressed at systemic, collective level.
The author also refutes the zero-sum-game hypothesis and insists that the much-misquoted 2nd Law of Thermodynamics does not apply to systems that have living beings in them; that it IS possible to increase order over time as exemplified by planet Earth's biosphere; to have win-win situations and increase prosperity for all.
No comments:
Post a Comment